Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Anderson v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 888 File number: QUD 828 of 2016
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 13 June 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of a migration decision under s 476A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act) – where the Minister made a decision under s 501(2) of the Act to cancel the applicant's absorbed person visa on the basis that he did not pass the character test due to having a substantial criminal record – where the Minister had made an earlier decision under s 501(3A) of the Act purporting to cancel the applicant's transitional (permanent) visa – whether the first cancellation decision had the effect of cancelling the absorbed person visa by operation of s 501F of the Act – whether the applicant held a transitional (permanent) visa in the first place – whether the first cancellation decision was a nullity – whether, in making the second cancellation decision, the applicant was denied procedural fairness – whether there had been a failure to take into account relevant considerations – whether the risk of reoffending was a mandatory relevant consideration – whether any irrelevant considerations were taken into account – whether using words like "privilege" and "expectations of the community" in the statement of reasons gave rise to jurisdictional error – whether Ministerial Directions under the Act were binding – whether the decision was illogical, irrational and unreasonable Held: application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment Act 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: AZAFQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 243 FCR 451; [2016] FCAFC 105 Bochenski v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 153 ALD 309; [2016] FCA 989 Johnson v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 136 FCR 494; [2004] FCA 137 Maxwell v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 249 FCR 275; [2016] FCA 47 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Schwart [2003] FCAFC 229 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1; [2016] FCAFC 11 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Tesic (2017) 251 FCR 23; [2017] FCAFC 93 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Nystrom (2006) 228 CLR 566; [2006] HCA 50 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh (2004) 139 FCR 505; [2004] FCAFC 256 Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476; [2003] HCA 2 Sales v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 171 FCR 56; [2008] FCAFC 132 Tesic v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1465
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate