Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Scapin v The University of Notre Dame Australia [2018] FCA 906 File number: WAD 164 of 2017
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 15 June 2018
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – interlocutory application for summary judgment – alternatively, interlocutory application for orders to strike out parts of the applicant's statement of claim and require her to replead – where applicant pleaded breach of statutory duty, breach of implied term of good faith and adverse action – where respondent sought splitting order – no splitting order made – specific paragraphs of statement of claim struck out with liberty to replead – interlocutory application otherwise dismissed
Legislation: Constitution s 109 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 3, 50, 171(a), 340, 342(1), 351, 547, 550 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 21, 51A, 37M Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 (WA) s 19 Workers' Compensation and Injury Management Act 1981 (WA) ss 19, 93B(1), 93C, 93K(4), Pt IV, Div 2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) RR 16.21, 16.43, 30.01
Cases cited: American Express Co v British Airways Board [1983] 1 WLR 701 Arnett-Somerville v Monash Health [2016] FCA 1451 Attorney-General v Kowalski [2014] SASC 1 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169; [2014] HCA 32 Education Department of Western Australia v Morgan [2000] WASCA 291 Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd v Southern Pacific Petroleum NL (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrators Appointed) & Ors [2005] VSCA 228 King v King (1920) 26 ALR 277; [1920] VLR 443 Lochgelly Iron and Coal Company Limited v M'Mullan [1934] AC 1 Loongana Lime Pty Ltd v Worth (2006) 203 FLR 268 at 278 [27]; [2006] WASCA 183 Napier v BHP Billiton (Worsley Alumina) Pty Ltd [2015] WASCA 230; (2015) 49 WAR 243 at [93]-[97]; [2015] WASCA 230 Newcombe v AME Properties Ltd and Another (1995) 14 WAR 259 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Proprietary Limited and Others v Maritime Union of Australia and Others (1998) 195 CLR 1; [1998] HCA 30 Philip Morris Ltd v Ainley & Incorporated Nominal Defendant [1975] VR 345 Qantas Airways Ltd and Another v Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association (2012) 202 FCR 244 at [32]; [2012] FCAFC 63 Regulski v State of Victoria [2015] FCA 206 Russell v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney and Another (2007) 69 NSWLR 198; [2007] NSWSC 104 St John of God Health Care Inc v Ausin (2004) 46 WAR 208; [2014] WASCA 11 Transfield Pty Ltd v Rawstron [2005] WASCA 78 Van Efferen v CMA Corporation Ltd (2015) 183 IR 319; [2009] FCA 597 Walker v Citigroup Global Markets Pty Ltd (formerly Saloman Smith Barney Australia Securities Pty Ltd) and Another (2005) 226 ALR 114; [2005] FCA 1678 Whelan v Cigarette & Gift Warehouse Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1534
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate