Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PXYJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 927 File number: WAD 565 of 2017
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 21 June 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where the Tribunal affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the applicant a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa pursuant to s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where the applicant incorrectly sought to 'appeal' from the Tribunal's decision under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal erred in its consideration of the 'primary considerations' under Ministerial Direction No 65 and the 'best interests' of minor children – whether the Tribunal erred in considering whether the applicant had a well-founded fear of persecution in light of BCR16 – whether the Tribunal failed to appropriately assess Australia's international non-refoulement obligations – where no jurisdictional error demonstrated
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5J, 36(2), 476A(1)(b), 501, 501(1), 501CA(3) Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913 (WA)
Cases cited: AYY15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 130 BCR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 248 FCR 456 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Selvadurai v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 34 ALD 347 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 Vaitaiki v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1998) 150 ALR 608 Wan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 107 FCR 133
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate