Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jadwan Pty Ltd v Rae & Partners (A Firm) (No 4) [2018] FCA 968 File number: TAD 39 of 2016
Judge: KERR J
Date of judgment: 29 June 2018
Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – duty of care owed by solicitors and counsel in providing legal advice to a nursing home operator – whether respondents were negligent in failing to advise the applicant of proposed and relevantly later enacted legislation that would regulate the aged care industry – whether respondents were negligent in failing to advise of available grounds for challenging validity of review panels constituted under the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) and to challenge sanctions imposed by the Minister pursuant to s 45E of that Act – whether advice could have prevented the Minister from revoking the applicant's approval to operate a nursing home – whether advice would have enabled the applicant to obtain an injunction and rebuild a new nursing home facility or to sell its bed licences – application dismissed
Legislation: Constitution, s 75(v) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 5, 6, 11, 16 Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) Aged Care (Consequential Provisions) Act 1997 (Cth), s 7 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 135, 136, 143 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), s 5 National Health Act 1953 (Cth), ss 40AA, 44, 45D, 45E, 105AAB National Health Regulations 1954 (Cth), regs 11, 12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate