Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Barkhazen v Conair Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 992 File number: NSD 2190 of 2016
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 29 June 2018
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – costs – summary dismissal of application for judicial review – whether proceedings instituted without reasonable cause in accordance with s 570(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether costs should be paid by the applicant's legal representatives
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 400, 570 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 40.02(b)
Cases cited: Baker v Patricks Projects Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 166; 145 ALD 548 Barkhazen v Conair Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1585 Bayley & Associates Pty Ltd v DBR Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 346 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1995) 57 FCR 119 Lemoto v Able Technical Pty Ltd & 2 Ors [2005] NSWCA 153; 63 NSWLR 300 Levick v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 674; 102 FCR 155 Mitry Lawyers v Barnden [2014] FCA 918 Myers v Elman [1940] AC 282 Orchard v South Eastern Electricity Board [1987] QB 565 Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205 Su v Australian Fisheries Management Authority (No 3) [2008] FCA 2018
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions 27 February 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate