Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hutchison v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2018] FCA 1002 File number: WAD 144 of 2018
Judge: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 3 July 2018
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether a decision to decline to require production of documents under s 37(2) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) is a decision within the meaning of s 44(1) – whether decision determinative – whether proposed appeal incompetent
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 37, 44 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 6 Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 19 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 920A, 920B Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955 (Cth) s 52 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 33.30
Cases cited: Alcoa of Australia Ltd v Swiss Aluminium Australia Ltd [1986] FCA 88; (1986) 9 ALD 345 APRA v VBN [2005] FCA 1860 Australian Postal Corporation v Forgie [2003] FCAFC 223; (2003) 130 FCR 279 Australian Postal Corporation v Sinnaiah [2013] FCAFC 98; (2013) 213 FCR 449 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v PTLZ [2008] FCAFC 164; (2008) 48 AAR 559 Chief of Navy v Angre [2016] FCAFC 171; (2016) 244 FCR 457 Clements v Independent Indigenous Advisory Committee [2003] FCAFC 143; (2003) 131 FCR 28 Commissioner of Patents v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] FCAFC 129; (2017) 349 ALR 142 Commissioner of Taxation v Cancer and Bowel Research Association [2013] FCAFC 140; (2013) 305 ALR 534 Cremona v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2015] FCAFC 72; (2015) 230 FCR 1 Cremona v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2013] FCA 1003 Director-General of Social Services v Chaney [1980] FCA 108; 47 FLR 80 Douglass v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2017] FCA 1105 Geographical Indications Committee v The Honourable Justice O'Connor [2000] FCA 1877; (2000) 64 ALD 325 Hutchison and Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2018] AATA 760 Hutchison and Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2017] AATA 1419 Irwin v Military Rehabilitation & Compensation Commission [2009] FCAFC 33; (2009) 174 FCR 574 Kishore v Tax Practitioners Board [2016] FCA 1328; (2016) 244 FCR 320 Kowalski v Repatriation Commission [2009] FCAFC 107; (2009) 259 ALR 444 Luck v Chief Executive Officer of Centrelink (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 112 News Corporation Ltd v National Companies and Securities Commission [1984] FCA 446; (1984) 5 FCR 88 O'Sullivan v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCA 387 Rana v Repatriation Commission [2011] FCAFC 123; (2011) 196 FCR 137 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 Yao v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2010] FCA 18
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate