Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth of Australia v Jones [2018] FCA 1008 File number: NSD 826 of 2017
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 5 July 2018
Catchwords: EDUCATION – where the respondent fabricated three certificates purporting to be bona fide vocational education and training qualifications for his own financial benefit – where the parties reached an agreement as to relief in respect of the three contraventions under s 125 of the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011 (Cth) (NVETR Act), including the appropriate range of penalties to impose under s 137 of the NVETR Act – where the respondent cooperated with the applicant upon the commencement of this proceeding
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011 (Cth) ss 2A, 3, 125, 137, 155
Cases cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Clean Energy v MT Solar Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 205 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (2012) 201 FCR 378 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (2015) 258 CLR 482 Commonwealth of Australia v Restar [2016] FCA 657 Forster v Jododex Aust Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd (1991) ATPR 41-076; [1990] FCA 762
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate