Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Blow Bar Co Pty Limited v McGann (No 4) [2018] FCA 1072 File number: NSD 1896 of 2017
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2018
Catchwords: COSTS – where partially successful interlocutory application by respondents, including a further successful application to strike out certain paragraphs of the amended statement of claim – whether costs should be payable forthwith
Cases cited: Blow Bar Co Pty Limited v McGann [2018] FCA 293 Blow Bar Co Pty Limited v McGann (No 2) [2018] FCA 459 Blow Bar Co Pty Limited v McGann (No 3) [2018] FCA 980 Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd v Clipso Electrical Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 37 Courtney v Medtel Pty Ltd (No 3) [2004] FCA 347 QS Holdings Sarl v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1038
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 17 July 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr R Notley
Solicitor for the Applicants: Rigby & Klaus
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms R White
Solicitor for the Respondents: K&L Gates
ORDERS NSD 1896 of 2017
BETWEEN: BLOW BAR CO PTY LIMITED First Applicant
LEIGH DOLE PTY LIMITED AS TRUSTEE FOR THE DOLE FAMILY TRUST Second Applicant
AND: TIMOTHY MCGANN First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate