Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Castle v United States [2018] FCA 1079 File number: VID 1415 of 2017
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – request for access to documents on the Court file by a non-party – objections by applicant and first respondent in the proceeding to the release of documents – principle of open justice – no basis for the making of suppression or non-publication orders – no basis for refusing leave to access restricted documents – request for access to documents granted
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth), ss 19(9), 21 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 17, 37AE, 37AF, 37AG Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 91X Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 2.32
Cases cited: Baptist Union of Queensland - Carnity v Roberts [2015] FCA 1068; 241 FCR 13 Castle v United States [2018] FCA 931 Hogan v Hinch [2011] HCA 4; 243 CLR 506 John Fairfax Group v Local Court of NSW (1991) 26 NSWLR 131 Russell v Russell [1976] HCA 23; 134 CLR 495 SRD v Australian Securities Commission [1994] FCA 549; 52 FCR 187
Date of last submissions: 11 July 2018
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate