Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hong v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1085 File number: NSD 2203 of 2017
Judge: LEE J
Date of judgment: 20 July 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review of a non-revocation of a mandatory visa cancellation made pursuant to s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – application made pursuant to s 401CA(4) of the Act for revocation of the mandatory visa cancellation – whether the Tribunal failed to consider a claim made by the applicant – whether the alleged claim was sufficiently raised on the material, evidence and submissions before the Tribunal – whether the decision was legally unreasonable – whether the Tribunal failed to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration to the applicant's claims – whether the Tribunal denied the applicant procedural fairness by failing to put its view of her use of an interpreter to her – no jurisdictional error identified – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 499, 501(3A), 501CA(4)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 236 FCR 593 Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83; (2015) 231 FCR 513 AYY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 89 Bochenski v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 68; (2017) 250 FCR 209 Buadromo v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1592 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 Lee v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 464 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Muggeridge v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 200; (2017) 351 ALR 153 Sevdalis v Director of Professional Services Review [2017] FCAFC 9 SGBB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 709; (2003) 199 ALR 364 Swift v SAS Trustee Corporation [2010] NSWCA 182; (2010) 6 ASTLR 339 SZSHK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 125; (2013) 138 ALD 26 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) (1985) 59 ALJR 481
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate