Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ADF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1099 Appeal from: ADF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCCA 3230
File number: NSD 2227 of 2016
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 25 July 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – protection visas – appeal from the decision of the Federal Circuit Court to dismiss application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal to refuse application for a Protection (Class XA) visa – consideration of nature of appeal to Federal Court – appeal by way of rehearing – whether Appellant identified appellable error – whether Tribunal considered complimentary protection obligations PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – legal representation – whether right to legal assistance – consideration of circumstances in which a referral should be made for pro bono legal assistance – whether referral to legal assistance should be made
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 4.12, 36.75
Cases cited: ADF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCCA 3230 AMF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 68, (2016) 241 FCR 30 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833, (2001) 117 FCR 424 Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 McGibbon v Linkenbagh (1996) 41 ALD 219 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2017] FCAFC 33, (2017) 248 FCR 1 MZAGE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 630 New South Wales v Canellis (1994) 181 CLR 309 SZRUR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 146, (2013) 216 FCR 445 SZTYY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 985 SZVLE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 90
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate