Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Origo & Co Pty Ltd (formerly Daiso (Australia) Pty Ltd) [2018] FCA 1111 File number: VID 399 of 2017
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2018
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – product safety of consumer goods – alleged contraventions of product safety standards – where respondent admitted contraventions – where parties prepared statement of agreed facts and jointly proposed declarations and a pecuniary penalty – whether declarations and proposed orders appropriate – proposed declarations and orders made
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 138, Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 29, 106, 136, 224, 228 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 (Vic), ss 10, 223, 224
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2017] ATPR 42-557; [2017] FCAFC 159 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kokos International Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] ATPR 42-212; [2008] FCA 5 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd (2016) 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (2015) 258 CLR 482 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Daiso Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 683 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Daiso Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 720 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Daiso Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 1488 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Gibson [2017] FCA 240 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Gibson (No 3) [2017] FCA 1148 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Hocking Stuart (Richmond) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 1435 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Rizeq v Western Australia (2017) 344 ALR 421 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 287 ALR 249 Trade Practices Commission v Allied Mills Industries Pty Ltd (No 5) (1981) 60 FLR 38; 37 ALR 256 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1991] ATPR 41-076; [1990] FCA 762 Walker v Sell (2016) 245 FCR 308
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate