Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Oakmoore Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1169 File number: QUD 478 of 2016
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 13 August 2018
Catchwords: COMPETITION – collusive arrangement – exclusive dealing – third respondent admitted to contraventions of ss 45 and 47 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) – seventh respondent admitted to being directly and knowingly concerned in third respondent's contraventions within meaning of s 76(1)(e) of the Act – enforcement and remedies – application for agreed declarations, pecuniary penalties and non-punitive orders – whether proposed declarations, penalties and orders appropriate – consideration of principles – proposed declarations and orders made and penalties imposed
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 45, 47, 76, 77, 86C Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 45, 47, 76, 77, 86C
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; (2017) 254 FCR 68 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Acquire Learning & Careers Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 602 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 159; (2017) ATPR 42-557 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2006] FCA 1730; (2007) ATPR 42-140 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Econovite Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 964 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Qantas Airways Limited [2008] FCA 1976; (2008) 253 ALR 89 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd [2012] FCA 1395 Comcare v Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 500; (2015) 146 ALD 637 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; (2010) 269 ALR 1 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Alpha Flight Services Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 118 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 61; (1972) 127 CLR 421 J McPhee & Son (Aust) Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2000] FCA 365; (2000) 172 ALR 532 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan [2008] FCAFC 70; (2008) 168 FCR 383 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134; (1996) 71 FCR 285 R v Holder and Johnson [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v British Bank for Foreign Trade Ltd [1921] 2 AC 438 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; (2012) 287 ALR 249 The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39; (2015) 256 CLR 550 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762; (1991) ATPR 41-076
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate