Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Warren v Repatriation Commission [2018] FCA 1193 Appeal from: McKinley and Repatriation Commissioner (Veterans' entitlements) [2017] AATA 872
File number: VID 771 of 2017
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 13 August 2018
Catchwords: DEFENCE AND WAR – appeal on questions of law from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – where the Tribunal affirmed a decision of the Veterans' Review Board which in turn had affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Repatriation Commission to refuse to grant the applicant a pension – where the parties agreed that the Tribunal had erred and that the Tribunal's decision should be set aside – where the Tribunal had also found that it lacked jurisdiction to deal with the applicant's claims made under s 70 of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) on the basis that the Veterans' Review Board had not dealt with this claim – where that claim had been before the delegate of the Commission – whether the Tribunal had erred in its determination that it lacked jurisdiction – whether the scope of remittal to the Tribunal should be confined
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43(2), 43(2B), 44(5) Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 70(1), 70(5)(d)(i), 70(5)(d)(ii)
Cases cited: Davenport v Repatriation Commission (1995) 39 ALD 560; [1995] FCA 930 McKinley and Repatriation Commission (Veterans' entitlements) [2017] AATA 872 Repatriation Commission v Stafford (1995) 56 FCR 132; [1995] FCA 537 Stafford v Repatriation Commission (1995) 56 FCR 121; [1995] FCA 44 Warren v Repatriation Commission (2015) 238 FCR 124; [2015] FCAFC 159
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate