Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v H.J. Heinz Company Australia Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1286 File number: SAD 181 of 2016
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 24 August 2018
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – pecuniary penalty for contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law by the making of false or misleading representations – appropriate application of the course of conduct principle – aggregate of penalties where multiple contraventions occurred – whether a corrective publication order is necessary given length of time since contraventions occurred – whether an order for a compliance program is appropriate. COSTS – application for party and party costs by Applicant – apportionment of costs not appropriate given that the claims on which ACCC did not succeed involved similar factual enquiries to that on which it did succeed – orders as to costs when Applicant has acted in public interest in initiating proceedings.
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law ss 18, 29(1)(g), 224. 246 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 155 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 96(3)
Cases cited: Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budějovický Budvar, Národní Podnik [2002] FCA 624 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; (2017) 254 FCR 68 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Aveling Homes Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1470 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 159 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dermalogica Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 152; (2005) 215 ALR 482 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Harris Scarfe Australia Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 54 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v H.J. Heinz Company Australia Limited [2018] FCA 360 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 3) [2005] FCA 265; (2005) 215 ALR 301 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Panasonic Australia Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 856 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australian Inc [1999] FCA 18; (1999) 95 FCR 114 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v SMS Global Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 855 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2007] FCA 2058 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2010] FCA 790; (2010) 188 FCR 238 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Turi Foods Pty Ltd (No 5) [2013] FCA 1109 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73 Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482 Couch v The Attorney-General [2010] NZSC 27; [2010] 3 NZLR 149 Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 750 Luxottica Retail Australia Pty Ltd v Specsavers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 644
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate