Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liverpool City Council v McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc (now known as S&P Global Inc) [2018] FCA 1289 File number(s): NSD 1018 of 2014 NSD 1020 of 2014 NSD 1021 of 2014 NSD 957 of 2015 NSD 1126 of 2015 NSD 414 of 2016
Judge: LEE J
Date of judgment: 9 August 2018
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – settlement approvals of six related proceedings pursuant to s 33V of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – gross settlement of $215 million reasonable but subject to proposed deductions of $92 million to a litigation funder and over $20 million to lawyers –whether the net return to group members means that the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and in the interests of group members – consideration of the power of the Court to interfere with contractual promises made by group members to litigation funder and circumstances as to whether such a power should be exercised – observations on the need for independent scrutiny of costs by a Referee – discussion as to the need to avoid unnecessary multiplicity of proceedings – broad confidentiality orders being sought when a commercial enterprise uses the public processes of the Court and the importance of open justice considerations – discussion of the need for caution in extinguishing the claims of any group members by exclusion from the settlement – settlement approved
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate