Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v De Martin & Gasparini Pty Limited (No 3) [2018] FCA 1395 File number: NSD 1143 of 2017
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 12 September 2018
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – pecuniary penalty – where first respondent breached s 340 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – single contravention – consideration of appropriate quantum of pecuniary penalty – where contravention considered to be serious, but not flagrant or deliberate – where seriousness of contravention mitigated by circumstances of contravention – where first respondent had good industrial record – where it was unlikely that even the maximum penalty would provide specific or general deterrence – appropriate quantum of civil penalty INDUSTRIAL LAW – whether declaration of contravention should be made under s 21 Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) – where parties agreed that a declaration should be made – consideration of whether the making of a declaration is appropriate – where appropriate case for making a declaration that first respondent contravened s 340 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Legislation: Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (Cth), s 54 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 4AA Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 12, 54, 207, 208, 209, 336, 340, 361, 539, 546, 550, 570, 793, Part 3-1 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21 Code for the Tendering and Performance of Building Work 2016 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2017) 254 FCR 68; [2017] FCAFC 113 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) (2010) 199 IR 373; [2010] FCA 977 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Apple Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 646 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 327 ALR 540; [2015] FCA 330 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2007) ATPR 42-140; [2006] FCA 1730 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 3) (2005) 215 ALR 301; [2005] FCA 265 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (2012) 201 FCR 378; [2012] FCAFC 56 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (No 2) (2011) 279 ALR 609; [2011] FCA 382 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GE Capital Finance Australia, in the matter of GE Capital Finance Australia [2014] FCA 701 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Southcorp Ltd (No 2) (2003) 130 FCR 406 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (2015) 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v De Martin & Gasparini Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 1046 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v State of Victoria (No 2) [2013] FCA 1034 Finance Sector Union v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2005) 224 ALR 467; [2005] FCA 1847 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Plancor Pty Ltd v Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union (2008) 171 FCR 357; [2008] FCAFC 170 Ponzio v B & P Caelli Constructions Pty Ltd (2007) 158 FCR 543; [2007] FCAFC 65 Re Chemeq Ltd; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Chemeq Ltd (2006) 234 ALR 511; [2006] FCA 936 Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v British Bank for Foreign Trade Ltd [1921] 2 AC 438 Re HIH Insurance Ltd (in liq) and HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd (in prov liq); Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler (2002) 42 ACSR 80; [2002] NSWSC 483 Sayed v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2016) 239 FCR 336; [2016] FCAFC 4 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 287 ALR 249; [2012] FCAFC 20 Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (No 2) (1993) 41 FCR 89 TPG Internet Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 210 FCR 277 Trade Practices Commission v Stihl Chain Saws (Aust) Pty Ltd (1978) ATPR 40-091 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762; (1991) ATPR 41-076 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate