Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sesalim v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2) [2018] FCA 1401 File numbers: VID 1297 of 2016 VID166 of 2017
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 11 September 2018
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – s 44(7) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1976 (Cth) ("AAT Act") – whether the Court should exercise discretion to make further findings of fact – whether to remit the matter for redetermination by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether any limitation should be imposed on the scope of the remittal COSTS – whether costs should follow the event
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1976 (Cth), s 44(7)
Cases cited: Martin v Comcare (2015) 238 FCR 373 May v Military Rehabilitation Compensation Commission (2015) 233 FCR 397 Sesalim v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2018] FCA 1159
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Registry: Victoria
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate