Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dixon (Trustee) v Citiline Developments Pty Limited, in the matter of Nasr (Bankrupt) [2018] FCA 1446 File number(s): NSD 1001 of 2018
Judge(s): LEE J
Date of judgment: 26 September 2018
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – whether s 304 of the Duties Act 1997 (NSW) is picked up by s 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) in respect of proceedings in the Federal Court where admissibility is governed by ss 55 and 56 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – applicability of s 9(3) of the Evidence Act
Legislation: Constitution Ch III Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 9(3), 55, 56 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 79 Duties Act 1997 (NSW) s 304
Cases Cited: Rizeq v Western Australia [2017] HCA 23; (2017) 344 ALR 421
Date of hearing: 5 September 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr R Parsons
Solicitor for the Applicants: SLF Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R D Marshall SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Forward Legal
ORDERS NSD 1001 of 2018 IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ROSTOM NASR
BETWEEN: STEPHEN ROBERT DIXON AND NICK MELLOS AS JOINT AND SEVERAL TRUSTEES OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ROSTOM NASR Applicants
AND: CITILINE DEVELOPMENTS PTY LIMITED ACN 610 325 141 Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate