Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McGlinn v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2018] FCA 1503 File number: WAD 171 of 2016
Judge: STEWARD J
Date of judgment: 9 October 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – remittal to Commissioner of Taxation – evidence to be considered on remittal – costs – where 28 affidavits filed by the applicant were not read at trial
Legislation: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 170 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 35-10, 35-55
Cases cited: Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280
Date of hearing: 25 July 2018
Date of last submissions: 7 September 2018
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Taxation
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Fickling
Solicitor for the Applicant: Hayes Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms C Thompson
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS WAD 171 of 2016
BETWEEN: ROBYN MCGLINN Applicant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Respondent
JUDGE: STEWARD J DATE OF ORDER: 9 October 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be allowed and the matter be remitted to the respondent for reconsideration in accordance with law. 2. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings save that: (a) the respondent shall pay only 50% of the costs thrown away by the applicant in preparing the 20 affidavits upon which she intended to rely as from 28 November 2017; (b) the respondent shall not pay the costs thrown away by the applicant in preparing the other eight affidavits filed and served in the proceeding; in each case, to be assessed if not agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate