Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AAP Industries Pty Limited v Han's Pipe Fittings Co Ltd [2018] FCA 1505 File number: NSD 2283 of 2017
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 9 October 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – order for standard discovery – whether respondents had complied with that order – whether order should be made for more extensive or particular discovery
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34, 20.14, 20.15, 20.21
Cases cited: Bertran v Vanstone [1999] FCA 1753 Taylor v Saloniklis (No 3) [2014] FCA 744
Date of hearing: 3 October 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 49
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr CD Wood with Mr J Raftery
Solicitor for the Applicants: Rydge Evans Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr MP Amerena
Solicitor for the Respondents: Accuro Legal
ORDERS NSD 2283 of 2017
BETWEEN: AAP INDUSTRIES PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 402 826) First Applicant
AAP ENGINEERING PTY LTD (ACN 000 157 077) Second Applicant
AND: HAN'S PIPE FITTINGS CO LTD First Respondent
GLOBAL VALVE & FITTINGS PTY LTD ( ACN 602 359 955) Second Respondent
HAN CHUNGSHENG Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate