Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The BKH Contractors Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 1563 File number: NSD 361 of 2016
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 18 October 2018
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – penalties – contraventions of ss 340, 343, 494, 500 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – quantification of penalties – primary objective of deterrence – considerations to be taken into account in quantifying penalties – consideration of relevance of maximum penalty – requirement to impose separate penalties for separate contraventions – imposition of penalties where multiple contraventions arise from a common set of facts – application of the course of conduct principle – application of the totality principle – consideration of the need for parity in penalties – consideration of relevance of loss caused by contravening conduct – consideration of relevance of the size and nature of a contravening organisation – consideration of relevance of submissions in the process of quantifying penalties
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340, 343, 355, 417, 421, 494, 500, 545, 546, 556, 557 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 80
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (The Australian Paper Case) (No 2) [2017] FCA 367 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 53, (2017) 249 FCR 458 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113, (2017) 254 FCR 68 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FCA 42 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3, (2018) 273 IR 211 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2010] FCA 977, (2010) 199 IR 373 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Quest Apartments Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 163 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Gava [2018] FCA 1480 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Huddy (No 2) [2017] FCA 1088 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Ingham (No 2) (The Enoggera Barracks Case) [2018] FCA 263 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v McCullough (No 2) [2017] FCA 295 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Parker [2017] FCA 564, (2017) 266 IR 340 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Parker (No 2) [2017] FCA 1082, (2017) 270 IR 165 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pauls [2017] FCA 843 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Upton (The Gorgon Project Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 897 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1997) 145 ALR 36 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Aveling Homes Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1470 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L. (No 13) [2017] FCA 851 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc [1999] FCA 1387, (1999) 95 FCR 114 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54, (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith [2008] FCAFC 8, (2008) 165 FCR 560 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 9) [2018] FCA 385 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wealth & Risk Management Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 59 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Non-Indemnification Personal Payment Case) [2018] FCAFC 97 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39, (2010) 194 IR 461 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46, (2015) 258 CLR 482 Darlaston v Parker [2010] FCA 771, (2010) 189 FCR 1 Darlaston v Parker (No 2) [2010] FCA 1382, (2010) 200 IR 353 Director of Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Stephenson [2014] FCA 1432, (2014) 146 ALD 75 Director of Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCA 1213 Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Bragdon (No 2) [2015] FCA 998 Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Cartledge [2014] FCA 1047 Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCA 226 Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FCA 413 Fair Work Ombudsman v Group Property Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 557 Fair Work Ombudsman v Jetstar Airways Ltd [2014] FCA 33 Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth Holdings Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 580 Flight Centre Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 53, (2018) 356 ALR 389 Kelly v Fitzpatrick [2007] FCA 1080, (2007) 166 IR 14 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25, (2005) 228 CLR 357 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales v Industrial Relations Secretary [2018] NSWCA 39 Registered Organisations Commissioner v Transport Workers' Union of Australia [2018] FCA 32 Rocky Holdings Pty Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2014] FCAFC 62, (2014) 221 FCR 153 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20, (2012) 287 ALR 249 Standen v Feehan (No 2) [2008] FCA 1574, (2008) 177 IR 276 United Firefighters Union of Australia v Country Fire Authority (No 2) [2017] FCA 1614
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate