Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Anderson v DKH18 [2018] FCA 1571 File number: SAD 157 of 2018
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 19 October 2018
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – contempt of the Australian Crime Commission punishable as contempt of Federal Court – Respondent in contempt of Australian Crime Commission by refusing to answer questions – sentence of imprisonment until further order imposed.
Legislation: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 7, 7A, 7C, 22, 24A, 28, 30, 34A(a)(ii), 34B Securities Industry (South Australia) Code
Cases cited: Anderson v XLVII [2015] FCA 19; (2015) 319 ALR 139 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v INFO4PC.com Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 949; (2002) 121 FCR 24 Hannaford v HH [2010] FCA 1214; (2010) 205 A Crim R 366 Hannaford v HH (No 2) [2012] FCA 560; (2012) 203 FCR 501 Hughes v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2004] FCAFC 319; (2004) 247 FCR 277 Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 83; (2006) 149 FCR 494 Principal Registrar of Supreme Court of NSW v Tran [2006] NSWSC 1183; (2006) 166 A Crim R 393 R v Razzak [2006] NSWSC 1366; (2006) 166 A Crim R 132 Royal Commission v Staunton [1995] NSWSC 45 Sage v ZZ (No 2) [2015] FCA 450; (2015) 234 FCR 251 Thelander v Woodward [1981] 1 NSWLR 644 Von Doussa v Owens (No 3) (1982) 31 SASR 116 Wood, Honourable Justice v Galea [1995] NSWSC 100 Wood v Staunton (No 5) (1996) 86 A Crim R 183
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate