Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Morris v McConaghy Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2018] FCA 1582 File number: NSD 1195 of 2017
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 19 October 2018
Catchwords: COSTS – whether indemnity costs should be ordered against respondent – where respondent successfully defended application for deemed service – where applicant not at fault for ineffective foreign service
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M
Cases cited: Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited [1993] FCA 801; 46 FCR 225
Date of hearing: 19 October 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr E Cox SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Aus Ship Lawyers
Counsel for First and Fourth Respondents: The First and Fourth Respondents did not appear
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr A Woods
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Lander & Rogers
Counsel for the Third Respondent: Ms S Scott
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Mahony Law
ORDERS NSD 1195 of 2017
BETWEEN: JONATHAN MORRIS Applicant
AND: MCCONAGHY AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 52 168 218 380 First Respondent
MC2 COMPOSITES LTD (A COMPANY INCORPORATED IN THE CAYMAN ISLANDS) Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate