Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Levick v Attorney-General [2018] FCA 1609 File number: NSD 1147 of 2018
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 24 October 2018
Date of publication of reasons: 25 October 2018
Catchwords: PRIVILEGE – whether respondent waived legal professional privilege over redacted portions of documents served upon applicant – held: applicant has not established wavier of legal professional privilege – interlocutory application dismissed with costs
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 7, 11, 19(2)(c), 22 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Extradition (United States of America) Regulations
Cases cited: Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto [2006] FCAFC 86; 151 FCR 341 NSW Council for Civil Liberties v Classification Review Board [2006] FCA 1409; 236 ALR 313 O'Connor v Adamas [2013] FCAFC 14; 210 FCR 364 Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice [2008] HCA 37; 234 CLR 275 Zentai v O'Connor (No 2) [2010] FCA 252; 183 FCR 180
Date of hearing: 24 October 2018
Registry: Sydney
Division: General
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Jackson
Solicitor for the Applicant: Hearn Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Lloyd SC with Mr T Glover
Solicitor for the Respondent: Commonwealth Attorney-General's Department
ORDERS NSD 1147 of 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate