Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Equifax Australia Information Services and Solutions Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1637 File number: NSD 399 of 2018
Judge: LEE J
Date of judgment: 27 September 2018
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law by a credit reporting body – misleading or deceptive representations and unconscionable conduct – consideration of principles in relation to fixing an appropriate penalty – Court cannot be satisfied that agreed position between the parties is not an appropriate remedy even though absent agreement the Court would have imposed larger penalties for serious unconscionable conduct – agreed orders made with agreed variation in relation to a consumer redress scheme
Legislation: Australia Consumer Law ss 18, 21, 24(1), 29(1)(g), 29(1)(i), 29(1)(l), 34, 224 Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) ss 18, 21, 29(1)(g), 29(1)(i) and 29(1)(l), 52(1)(b) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 155 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Parts IVA, VAA, s 37AG(1)(a)
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; (2017) 254 FCR 68 Australian Building Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3; (2018) 92 ALJR 219 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] FCA 1516; (2016) 118 ACSR 124 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Apple Pty Ltd (No 4) [2018] FCA 953 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Limited [2010] FCA 929 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330; (2015) 327 ALR 540 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Econovite Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 964 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pental Limited [2018] FCA 491 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc [1999] FCA 18; (1999) 161 ALR 79 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v RL Adams Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1016 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761; (2011) 282 ALR 246 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Target Australia Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1326 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2007] FCA 1370 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Southcorp Limited (No 2) [2003] FCA 1369; [2003] FCA 1369; (2003) 130 FCR 406 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Virgin Mobile Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 1548 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Woolworths (South Australia) Pty Ltd (Trading as Mac's Liquor) [2003] FCA 530 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Thomson Australian Holdings Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1981) 148 CLR 150 Financial Rights Legal Centre Inc and Veda Advantage Information Services and Solutions Ltd [2016] AICmr 88 (9 December 2016)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate