Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MTCT Services Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union [2018] FCA 1648 File number(s): VID 786 of 2017
Judge(s): O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 31 October 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend cross-claim – allowed in part – discovery dispute
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 12, 50, 186, 188, 343, 550
Cases cited: Ezy Accounting 123 Pty Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2018] FCAFC 134 Fair Work Ombudsman v Devine Marine Group Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1365 Potter v Fair Work Ombudsman [2014] FCA 187 Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v Communications, Electrical Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (2001) 109 FCR 378 Yorke v Lucas (1984) 158 CLR 661 Fowler, HW, A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 1983)
Date of hearing: 25 October 2018
Registry: Victoria
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Follett and Mr A Pollock
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kelly Hazell Quill Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr H Borenstein QC and Mr M Harding
Solicitor for the Respondents: Slater & Gordon
ORDERS VID 786 of 2017
BETWEEN: MTCT SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 070 140 251) Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN WORKERS' UNION First Respondent
AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING WORKERS' UNION Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate