Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AKR17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1684 Appeal from: AKR17 v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 1396
File number: NSD 1211 of 2018
Judge: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 6 November 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority not to grant a visa – where Authority found the appellant did not have a real or imputed Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) profile – where Authority stated that information indicated that human rights violations involved those with real or perceived links to the LTTE – whether Authority had a "real doubt" about its conclusion– whether Authority erred in failing to consider the possibility that it was "wrong"
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H(1), 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 476
Cases cited: BDO15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 619 CCW17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1543 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 92 ALJR 713 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220 MZXSA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 123; 117 ALD 441
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate