Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Turanga v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1696 File number: NSD 788 of 2018
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 9 November 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Tribunal held there was not "another reason" why the original cancellation decision should be revoked and affirmed decision of delegate of the Minister – whether jurisdictional error in Tribunal's decision
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A, 499, 501CA
Dates of hearing: 5 October and 6 November 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 78
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr K Eskerie of Sparke Helmore
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent submitted save as to costs
ORDERS NSD 788 of 2018
BETWEEN: JOHN BEAU MOHI TURANGA Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 9 NOVEMBER 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be amended to identify the second respondent as the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. 2. The application is dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent, as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate