Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Palmer v Parbery (Liquidator), in the matter of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] FCA 1709 File number: QUD 783 of 2018
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 31 October 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where summonses for examination were issued in a related proceeding – application to stay those summonses – whether the claim for relief in the related proceeding was "well arguable" – stay application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 31 October 2018
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicants: E Robinson
Solicitor for the Applicants: Alexander Law
Counsel for the Respondent: R Newlinds SC and D Sulan
Solicitor for the Respondent: King & Wood Mallesons
ORDERS QUD 783 of 2018
IN THE MATTER OF QUEENSLAND NICKEL PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 009 842 068
BETWEEN: CLIVE FREDERICK PALMER First Applicant
CRAIG GUNNIS Second Applicant
RYAN MATTHEW MENSINK (and another named in the Schedule) Third Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate