Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sykes v Intermediate Capital Asia Pacific 2008 GP Limited [2018] FCA 1848 File number: SAD 96 of 2017
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 27 November 2018
Catchwords: COSTS – interlocutory application for security for costs issued by the first, second, third, fourth sixth, seventh and eight respondents – interlocutory application for security for costs issued by the fifth respondent – both interlocutory applications brought pursuant to s 56(1) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 19.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where applicants are private individuals, not corporations – where disposition not to make an order for security for costs against private individuals – whether reason to believe that the applicants will be unable to pay the respondents' costs if so ordered – consideration of the likely costs of the respondents of the proceeding and the net assets of the applicants – whether, having regard to the circumstances, there will be injustice to the respondents if they are required to defend the proceeding without the applicants providing security for costs – whether applicants engaged in a two-case strategy – consideration of other relevant factors which would warrant an order for security for costs against private individuals – whether applicants have an arguable or triable case – whether order for security for costs would shut the applicants out of pursuing the case – whether the applicants' impecuniosity arises out of the breaches alleged against the respondents – whether public interest considerations weigh in the balance against an order for security for costs and discretionary matters peculiar to the case – whether substantial risk that the applicants cannot satisfy an order for costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate