Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1946 Appeal from: Pham v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 3272
File number: VID 8 of 2018
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 26 November 2018
Date of publication of reasons: 4 December 2018
Legislation: Migration Legislation Amendment Regulation 2012 (No 5) (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: Dang v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 1426 Shrestha v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 359 ALR 22; [2018] HCA 35
Date of hearing: 26 November 2018
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 35
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr N Wood
Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Piper
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
ORDERS VID 8 of 2018
BETWEEN: NGOC TIEP PHAM Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: MIDDLETON J DATE OF ORDER: 26 November 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate