Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Landmark Operations Limited (t/a Seednet) [2018] FCA 1977 File number(s): VID 952 of 2018
Judge(s): O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 7 December 2018
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – where applicant and respondent reached agreement as to liability and applicable penalties for respondent's breach of the Australian Consumer Law – where respondent made representations about quality and capabilities of a new agricultural product on the market – consideration of principles for penalties – court approved parties' agreement and made orders sought
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, ss 18, 29(1), 33, 224 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 191 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 21, 43
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330; (2015) 327 ALR 540 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Ford Motor Company of Australia, [2018] FCA 703 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 3) [2005] FCA 265; (2005) 215 ALR 30 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths (South Australia) Pty Ltd (t/a Mac's Liquor) [2003] FCA 530; (2003) 198 ALR 417 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (2015) 258 CLR 482 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 287 ALR 249; [2012] FCAFC 20
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate