Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology [2018] FCA 1985 File number(s): VID 1559 of 2018
Judge(s): WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 10 December 2018
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – application for interlocutory order restraining vote for an enterprise agreement – whether misleading representations made concerning proposed agreement – whether representations made "knowingly or recklessly" – whether conduct in trade or commerce - balance of convenience – application dismissed.
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2, Australian Consumer Law s 18, 232 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 180, 182(1), 185, 341, 345, 545 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Mariner Corporation Ltd (2015) 241 FCR 502 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 CEPU v Australian Postal Corporation [2017] FCA 1091 Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (2015) 230 FCR 298 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v CUB Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 692 Fair Work Ombudsman v Ecosway Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 296 Grocon Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Victoria) (2003) 127 IR 13 Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association v Karellas Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) (2007) 166 IR 51 Shop Distributive & Allied Employees' Association v Karellas Investments Pty Ltd (2008) 166 FCR 562 Westpac Banking Corporation v Wittenberg (2016) 242 FCR 505
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate