Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FOF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 100 Appeal from: FOF17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 1326
File number(s): NSD 978 of 2018
Judge(s): WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court – new information provided to the Immigration Assessment Authority – failure to disclose source of new information – source of information relevant to information's credibility – no error in primary judge's reasons – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 473D(a), s 473CA, 473DC, s 473DD, s 473FB, s 474DC, s 474DD(a), s 477DD.
Cases cited: Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 353 ALR 600
Date of hearing: 21 November 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr O Jones
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T Reilly
Solicitor for the First Respondent: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting appearance
ORDERS NSD 978 of 2018
BETWEEN: FOF17 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS First Respondent
IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY Second Respondent
JUDGE: WHEELAHAN J DATE OF ORDER: 12 February 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The appeal be dismissed. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal to be assessed in default of agreement. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate