Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cryosite Limited [2019] FCA 116 File number(s): VID 830 of 2018
Judge(s): BEACH J
Date of judgment: 13 February 2019
Catchwords: COMPETITION – cartel conduct – restricting or limiting supply – market sharing – contract containing a cartel provision – conduct giving effect to cartel provision – pecuniary penalty
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 44ZZRD, 44ZZRJ, 44ZZRK, 76
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Ltd [2017] FCAFC 159 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd trading as Bet365 (No 2) [2016] FCA 698 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Humax Pty Ltd (2005) ATPR 42-072 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Olex Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 222 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation (2018) 357 ALR 55 Australian Energy Regulator v Snowy Hydro Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 58 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac (No 3) (2018) 131 ACSR 585; [2018] FCA 1701 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Gibson (No 3) [2017] FCA 1148 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421
Date of hearing: 11 February 2019
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Economic Regulator, Competition and Access
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate