Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Goyal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 170 Appeal from: Goyal v Minister for Immigration\ [2018] FCCA 2392
File number(s): VID 1168 of 2018
Judge(s): ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review – where appellant did not appear – rule 36.75 – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), 25(2B)(bb)(ii) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011, r 36.75
Cases cited: Goyal v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 2392 Singh v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 3423
Date of hearing: 5 February 2019
Date of last submissions: 29 January 2019
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear
Counsel for the Defendants: MR C. Tran
Solicitor for the Defendants: Clayton Utz
ORDERS VID 1168 of 2018
BETWEEN: SUNIL GOYAL Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Defendant
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Defendant
JUDGE: ANASTASSIOU J DATE OF ORDER: 19 FEBRUARY 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate