Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Milam v University of Melbourne [2019] FCA 171
File number: VID 82 of 2019
Judge: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2019
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – investigation into the Applicant – whether investigation in compliance with Enterprise Agreement – whether s 50 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) applies – whether conduct misconduct or serious misconduct – injunction granted
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: ABCC v CFMEU (2009) 189 IR 37 Aktiebolaget Hassle v Biochemie Australia Pty Ltd (2003) 57 IPR 1; [2003] FCA 496 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148; [1986] 60 ALJR 679; [1986] 67 ALR 553 Hexal Australia Pty Ltd v Roche Therapeutics Inc (2005) 66 IPR 325; [2005] FCA 1218 Samsung Electronics Co Limited v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238 Sigma Pharmaceuticals (Aust) Pty Ltd v Wyeth (2009) 81 IPR 339; [2009] FCA 595 Tidy Tea Ltd v Unilever Australia Ltd (1995) 32 IPR 405 United Motor Search Pty Ltd v Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1104
Date of hearing: 7 and 12 February 2019
Date of last submissions: 7 February 2019
Registry: Victoria
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicant: MR C. Tran
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate