Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth of Australia v Endresz [2019] FCA 301 File numbers: ACD 42 of 2018 ACD 43 of 2018 ACD 44 of 2018 ACD 45 of 2018
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2019
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application to go behind judgment – argument that judgment a nullity – procedural irregularity – failure to have judgment set aside PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – indorsement on Originating Application – whether statement of claim went beyond the metes and bounds of indorsement
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 43 Corporations Law Act 1997 (Cth) ss 232, 243ZE Supreme Court Rules 1937 (ACT) O 69, r 2
Cases cited: ASIC v Forge & Ors [2002] NSWSC 760. Auckland Harbour Board v R [1924] AC 318 Commonwealth v Davis Samuel Pty Ltd (No 7) [2013] ACTSC 146, (2013) 282 FLR 1 Commonwealth of Australia v Davis Samuel Pty Limited (No 8) [2014] ACTSC 312 Commonwealth of Australia v Davis Samuel Pty Limited (No 11) [2017] ACTSC 2, (2017) 316 FLR 159 Davis Samuel Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia [2016] ACTCA 22 Forge & Ors v ASIC [2014] NSWCA 448 Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Ltd v Compton [2017] HCA 28, (2017) 261 CLR 132 Renowden v McMullin (1970) 123 CLR 584 Wren v Mahoney (1972) 126 CLR 212
Date of hearing: 16 October 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate