Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AWN17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 440 Appeal from: AWN17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 372
File number(s): NSD 288 of 2018
Judge(s): DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 3 April 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – application for a protection visa – whether applicant had a real and meaningful hearing – whether there was a breach of s 425 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal breached the requirements of procedural fairness by reason of flawed translation during the hearing – whether mistranslations amount to a material breach of s 425 – jurisdictional error established
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 93 ALJR 252 Perera v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 92 FCR 6 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 115 FCR 1 State Rail Authority (NSW) v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588 SZNCY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 611 SZRMQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2013) 219 FCR 212 SZSEI v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 465 SZUYU v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 786 WACO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 131 FCR 511 WALN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 131
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate