Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 449 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Federal Circuit Court Orders made on 29 January 2018 by Judge Riethmuller
File number: VID 112 of 2018
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 26 March 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for leave to appeal a decision of the Federal Circuit Court – whether denial of natural justice in dismissing the matter for non-appearance pursuant to r 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24(1A) Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), rr 13.03C(1)(c), 16.05(2)
Cases cited: House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499
Date of hearing: 26 March 2019
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms M Montalban of DLA Piper Australia
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
ORDERS VID 112 of 2018
BETWEEN: MANDEEP SINGH Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: BROMBERG J DATE OF ORDER: 26 MARCH 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicant's application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of that application Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate