Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cash Bazaar Pty Ltd v RAA Consults Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 450 File number: VID 1348 of 2017
Judge: STEWARD J
Date of judgment: 19 March 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment under r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where respondent failed to comply with an order of the Court – where no defence filed – where the respondent has not participated in the proceeding
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law s 18 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 5.23 Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 (Vic)
Cases cited: Arthur v Vaupotic Investments Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 433 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 Macquarie Bank Ltd v Seagle (2005) 146 FCR 400 Professional Administration Service Centres Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCAFC 180; (2012) 295 ALR 52 Speedo Holdings BV v Evans (No 2) [2011] FCA 1227
Date of hearing: 19 March 2019
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate