Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner [2019] FCA 461 File number(s): NSD 2221 of 2016
Judge(s): BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 5 April 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – subpoenas for production – where first respondent raised objections to applicants accessing material produced – whether apparent relevance established – whether scope appropriate – held: objections rejected
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia, Subpoenas and Notices to Produce Practice Note (GPN-SUBP)
Cases cited: Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404 Attorney-General (NSW) v Chidgey [2008] NSWCCA 65; 182 A Crim R 536 Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings Ltd v BlueScope Ltd [2010] FCA 739 Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 R v Saleam [1999] NSWCCA 86 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 5) [2005] FCA 510; 216 ALR 147 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd [1989] FCA 340; 88 ALR 90
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 14 February 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr S D'Emilio of SD Commercial Lawyers Pty Ltd Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr A W Sandbach
Solicitor for the First Respondent: AJH Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate