Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v viagogo AG [2019] FCA 544 File number(s): NSD 1489 of 2017
Judge(s): BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 18 April 2019
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – contravention of ss 18, 29(1) and/or 34 of the Australian Consumer Law – part price representations in contravention of s 48(1) of the Australian Consumer Law – where respondent represented that it was an authorised or official seller of tickets when it was not – where respondent made representations as to number of tickets remaining available for sale from the venue when in fact remaining tickets available were only from the respondent – where total price not adequately disclosed because of additional fees– where part price representations were made in breach of s48(1) – conduct in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law for each of the alleged misrepresentations
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2, ss 18, 29(1), 34, 48 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 55, 140 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53C
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v AirAsia Berhad Company [2012] FCA 1413 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634; 317 ALR 73 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1263 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Le Sands Restaurant [2011] FCA 105 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1177 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Titan Marketing Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 913 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1254 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v We Buy Houses Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 915 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60; 218 CLR 592 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 4) [2006] FCA 446; 229 ALR 136 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited [2000] HCA 12; 202 CLR 45 CRW Pty Ltd v Sneddon (1972) AR (NSW) 17 Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1984] FCA 167; 2 FCR 82 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013] HCA 1; 249 CLR 435 Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Cassidy (2003) 135 FCR 1 National Exchange Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2004] FCAFC 90; 61 IPR 420 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Proprietary Limited v Puxu Proprietary Limited [1982] HCA; 149 CLR 191 Peter Bodum A/S v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98; 280 ALR 639 S & I Publishing Pty Ltd v Australian Surf Life Saver Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1463; 168 ALR 396 SAP Australia Pty Ltd v Sapient Australia Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1821; 169 ALR 1 State Government Insurance Corporation v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1991) 28 FCR 511 TPG Internet Pty Ltd v ACCC [2012] FCAFC 190; 210 FCR 277 Valve v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2017] FCAFC 224; 351 ALR 584 Verrocchi v Direct Chemist Outlet Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 234; (2015) 112 IPR 200 Verrocchi v Direct Chemist Outlet Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 104; 247 FCR 570
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate