Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bartlett v Commonwealth of Australia [2019] FCA 571 File number: NSD 1388 of 2018
Judge: LEE J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2019
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – application for common fund order – content of notice to group members – funding terms – detailed affidavit evidence and submissions filed shortly before hearing – whether amicus curiae ought be appointed to consider material including fine details of order from perspective of group members – application withdrawn in circumstances where Court satisfied it was appropriate for amicus to be appointed – application for order dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Part VB
Date of hearing: 12 April 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 27
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr W A D Edwards with Mr R May
Solicitor for the Applicants: Shine Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms Williams SC with Ms Gleeson
Solicitor for the Respondent: King & Wood Mallesons
ORDERS NSD 1388 of 2018
BETWEEN: KIRSTY JANE BARTLETT First Applicant
ANTHONY CRAIG BARTLETT Second Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Respondent
JUDGE: LEE J DATE OF ORDER: 12 APRIL 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for a common fund order be dismissed. 2. The issue of costs is reserved. 3. On or by 16 April 2019, the parties provide an outline of written submissions in respect of costs, of no more than two pages in length, which identify the costs orders for which they contend in relation to the application for a common fund order. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate