Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BOY19 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 574 Appeal from: BOY19 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (Administrative Appeals Tribunal, No. 2017/5535, 22 November 2018)
File number(s): VID 1642 of 2018
Judge(s): O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 7 May 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed decision to refuse applicant citizenship on character grounds – meaning of satisfaction in s 21(2)(h) of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) – whether Tribunal erred in applying standard of comfortable satisfaction in assessing good character – meaning of good character in s 21(2)(h) of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) – whether Tribunal erred in taking into account applicant's lack of diligence in his dealings with governmental bodies – whether Court should make a finding of fact as to good character under s 44(7) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 44(1), 44(7) Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) ss 21(2)(h), 24(3)
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Ansett Australia Ltd (2000) 175 ALR 173 Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110 Cabal v Minister for Justice (2000) 101 FCR 112 CDNB and WLVM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] AATA 757 CLS15 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia (2017) 72 AAR 502 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Commissioner of Taxation v Roberts (1992) 37 FCR 246 Goldie v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 56 ALD 321; [1999] FCA 1277 Grass v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 231 FCR 128 Green v R (1971) 126 CLR 28 Irving v Minister of State for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1996) 68 FCR 422 Locke v Locke (1956) 95 CLR 165 Marku v Minister for Justice (2015) 237 FCR 580 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1 FCR 354 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 110 ALR 449; 67 ALJR 170 O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210 Rejfek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 Sullivan v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2014) 226 FCR 555 Sun v Minister for Immigration (2016) 243 FCR 220 Thomas v R (1960) 102 CLR 584 Waterford v The Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54 Whitlam v ASIC (2003) 57 NSWLR 559 Yum! Restaurants Australia Pty Ltd v Full Bench of Fair Work Australia (2012) 205 FCR 306
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate