Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DKI16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 629 Appeal from: DKI16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 2246
File number: NSD 1631 of 2018
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a judgment and orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCCA) dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) which had affirmed a decision of the Minister's delegate to refuse an application for a protection visa – sole ground of the judicial review application was that the appellant disagreed with the AAT's decision – FCCA held no jurisdictional error – no appealable error in FCCA's decision – appeal dismissed, with costs
Cases cited: DKI16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 2246
Date of hearing: 7 February 2019 and 6 May 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr L Dennis of MinterEllison
ORDERS NSD 1631 of 2018
BETWEEN: DKI16 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 6 May 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate