Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wilson v Britten-Jones [2019] FCA 747 File number: NSD 214 of 2019
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 24 May 2019
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction under s 46PP of Australian Human Rights Commission Act (1986) (Cth) – whether interlocutory injunction should be granted restraining respondents from convening meeting to consider whether applicant should be expelled from partnership – whether applicant demonstrated prima facie case for relief based on breach of s 14(3) and s 94 of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) – interlocutory injunction refused
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act (1986) (Cth) ss 3, 46P(2), 46PD, 46PF, 46PO, 46PP Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 14 Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1974 (Cth) s 23 Partnership Act 1981 (SA) s 28 Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) ss 5, 17(3), 94
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corp v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Purvis v State of New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) (2003) 217 CLR 92 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238 Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Apotex Pty Ltd (2014) 106 IPR 218
Date of hearing: 26 February 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate