Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tam v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 780 Appeal from: Tam v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 3728
File number: SAD 16 of 2019
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 29 May 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – the two Appellants had applied in a single application for Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visas (Temporary visa) and Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visas (Permanent visa) – a delegate of the Minister (the first delegate) refused the application for both visas and notified the Appellants of both decisions – Appellants sought (unsuccessfully) review of the decision refusing the Temporary visa in the Migration Review Tribunal (MRT) and judicial review of the MRT decision in the Federal Circuit Court (FCC) – the Department then re-notified the first delegate's decision refusing the Permanent visa – the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) affirmed the decision to the first delegate refuse the Permanent visa – application for judicial review in the FCC dismissed – appeal to the Federal Court – whether FCC had misunderstood its jurisdiction with respect to judicial review – whether the whole of the decision of the first delegate had been reviewable in the AAT by reason of a postulated defect in the notification required by s 66 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) of the first delegate's decision – whether the FCC should have found a denial of procedural fairness resulting from the non-disclosure of a s 375A certificate. Held: appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Constitution s 75(v) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5CB, 5F, 66, 67(4), 347, 348, 351, 359A, 375A, 474, 476 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.09A(3); cll 801, 820 of Sch 2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate