Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 797 File number: NSD 2358 of 2018
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 30 May 2019
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – admitted contraventions of ss 18 and 29(1)(m), Australian Consumer Law (ACL) – misleading or deceptive representations made on respondent airline's website – where representations in booking flow that fares were non-refundable when there may be an entitlement to a refund under statutory consumer guarantees – where representation in conditions of carriage that flight services were not subject to statutory guarantees – where representations in conditions liable to mislead consumers as to remedies available for non-compliance with consumer guarantees – consideration of principles for determining whether agreed penalty and other agreed orders for non-compliance with the ACL appropriate – where public importance in sending a strong message of deterrence to highlight importance of ensuring accuracy in making representations on consumer rights – where no intention to mislead – where high degree of co-operation by the respondents with the ACCC – where appropriate to impose agreed penalties and grant declaratory relief in terms agreed
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law ss 18, 29(1)(m) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3; (2018) 262 CLR 157 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Apple Pty Ltd (No 4) [2018] FCA 953 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1997) 145 ALR 36 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2015] FCA 330; (2015) 327 ALR 540 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (in liq) [2007] FCAFC 146; (2007) 161 FCR 513 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 698 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Homeopathy Plus! Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 1090 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jetstar Airways Pty Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 205 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jetstar Airways Pty Limited [2015] FCA 1263; [2016] ATPR 42-523 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Oticon Australia Pty Limited [2018] FCA 1826 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; (2016) 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; (2018) 357 ALR 55 Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation [2018] FCA 1733 Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; (2014) 253 CLR 58 BMW Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2004] FCAFC 167; (2004) 207 ALR 452 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; (2010) 269 ALR 1 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Limited (1972) 127 CLR 421 Hadgkiss v Aldin (No 2) [2007] FCA 2069; (2007) 169 IR 76 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; (2012) 287 ALR 249 TPG Internet Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 190; (2012) 210 FCR 277 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) ATPR ¶41-076
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate